Ali Miraj 12pm - 3pm
Fukushima operators send robot into worst-hit nuclear reactor
8 February 2022, 14:44
An earthquake and tsunami in 2011 unleashed a disastrous meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi.
A remote-controlled robot has been used to probe the hardest-hit nuclear reactor at Japan’s Fukushima plant, as officials push forward with clean-up operations that have been mired in delays and controversy.
An earthquake and tsunami in 2011 unleashed a disastrous meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi’s three reactors that partly sunk their radioactive cores into the plant’s concrete foundations, making removal extremely difficult.
The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company, said the submersible robot was sent into Unit 1’s primary containment vessel to install a guiding path for five subsequent robots, which will attempt to asses and take samples of the melted fuel that emits fatally high radiation.
The probe was launched five years after the operators sent another robot into the same badly-damaged reactor, but failed to get any images of the melted fuel.
The robot-led work, which was postponed from mid-January due to mechanical glitches, is expected to last for a few days before full-fledged probes begin.
Earlier probes showed that the fuel at Unit 1 is submerged by highly radioactive water as deep as two metres.
Five other robots, co-developed by Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy and the International Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissioning, a government-funded consortium, will be separately sent in for the investigation over the next several months.
The probe at Unit 1 aims to measure the melted fuel mounds, map them in three dimensions, analyse isotopes and their radioactivity, and collect samples, Tokyo Electric officials said.
Those are key to developing equipment and a strategy for a safe and efficient melted fuel removal.
About 900 tons of melted nuclear fuel remain inside the plant’s three reactors, including about 280 tons in Unit 1, and its removal is a daunting task that officials say will take 30 to 40 years. Critics say that is overly optimistic.