Fines for companies after people ‘aggressively pestered’ with cold calls

3 October 2022, 00:04

A phone being dialled (Lewis Stickley/PA)
A phone being dialled (Lewis Stickley/PA). Picture: PA

People were left ‘distressed, upset, worried and inconvenienced’, a watchdog ruled.

Four companies have been fined a total of £370,000 after flouting data laws to “aggressively pester” people with hundreds of thousands of nuisance phone calls.

According to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the companies were motivated “solely” by profit as they attempted to sell home insulation to those who had opted out of marketing calls.

Andy Curry, the watchdog’s investigations head, said the practice had left vulnerable people, including the terminally ill, “distressed, upset, worried and inconvenienced”.

All those who complained to the ICO were registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS), a statutory register of people who have said they do not want to receive calls.

Posh Windows UK Limited, which is based in Stoke-on-Trent, made 461,062 calls to those registered with the TPS between August 2020 and April 2021.

The company, which was fined £150,000, told the ICO that it complied with marketing laws, but its responses were deemed “vague, evasive and contradictory”.

Eco Spray Insulations Limited from Eastleigh, Hampshire, made 178,190 calls without screening against the TPS register and was fined £100,000.

Euroseal Windows Limited, based in Newcastle-under-Lyme, made 169,830 calls in 2020.

Having “deliberately made the calls to generate income”, it was handed an £80,000 penalty and an enforcement notice.

Green Logic UK Ltd from Derby, which made 11,825 calls in 2020, was also given an enforcement notice plus a £40,000 fine.

Along with failing to engage with the ICO, its calls were found to be “misleading and persistent, and all made for financial gain”.

Mr Curry said: “The complaints we received showed that people were distressed, upset, worried and inconvenienced by the calls.

“For people to feel this way, in their own homes where they should feel safe, is unacceptable.

“These companies all aggressively pestered people, including some vulnerable individuals, forcibly trying to make them buy products that they didn’t need or want.

“All of the calls were driven solely by the companies’ wish to make financial gain.”

By Press Association

More Technology News

See more More Technology News

Hands on a laptop

Estimated 7m UK adults own cryptoassets, says FCA

A teenager uses his mobile phone to access social media,

Social media users ‘won’t be forced to share personal details after child ban’

Google Antitrust Remedies

US regulators seek to break up Google and force Chrome sale

Jim Chalmers gestures

Australian government rejects Musk’s claim it plans to control internet access

Graphs showing outages across Microsoft

Microsoft outage hits Teams and Outlook users

The Google logon on the screen of a smartphone

Google faces £7 billion legal claim over search engine advertising

A person holds an iphone showing the app for Google chrome search engine

Apple and Google ‘should face investigation over mobile browser duopoly’

UK unveils AI cyber defence lab to combat Russian threats, as minister pledges unwavering support for Ukraine

British spies to ramp up fight against Russian cyber threats with launch of cutting-edge AI research unit

Pat McFadden

UK spies to counter Russian cyber warfare threat with new AI security lab

Openreach van

Upgrade to Openreach ultrafast full fibre broadband ‘could deliver £66bn boost’

Laptop with a virus warning on the screen

Nato countries are in a ‘hidden cyber war’ with Russia, says Liz Kendall

Pat McFadden

Russia prepared to launch cyber attacks on UK, minister to warn

A Google icon on a smartphone

Firms can use AI to help offset Budget tax hikes, says Google UK boss

Icons of social media apps, including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and WhatsApp, are displayed on a mobile phone screen

Growing social media app vows to shake up ‘toxic’ status quo

Will Guyatt questions who is responsible for the safety of children online

Are Zuckerberg and Musk responsible for looking after my kids online?

Social media apps on a phone

U16s social media ban punishes children for tech firm failures, charities say