University to pay £5,000 after student was 'offered higher grades for sexual activity'
30 April 2021, 08:43 | Updated: 30 April 2021, 11:17
A university has been told to pay a student £5,000 in compensation after their dissertation supervisor allegedly offered them "higher grades in exchange for sexual activity".
The Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) has released a number of complaints that students made over the past year, which include concerns over course delivery, the impact of Covid-19, as well as sexual harassment.
The watchdog, which looks at complaints across higher education, saw a rise in complaints about sexual misconduct in 2020, but the numbers are small.
READ MORE: Majority of students want mandatory sexual consent tests before university - survey
Among the complainants was a student who told staff that their dissertation supervisor was sexually harassing them and offering higher grades in exchange for sexual activity.
The staff member informed the student's academic department, which notified HR, and the student was allocated a new dissertation supervisor.
After three months, the student submitted a formal complaint with the provider as they had not been told what was being done.
Two months later the student was interviewed as part of an investigation, and a further five months after that the student was told that the supervisor remained in post but had been told not to contact the student again.
The student complained to the OIA about the time the process had taken, the lack of transparency in the process, and the outcome.
The watchdog told the provider to apologise and offer the student compensation of £5,000 for the distress caused as it concluded that the institution should "have treated the matter more urgently".
READ MORE: Half of women 'have suffered sexual assault by a partner while asleep'
The OIA ruled that the provider did not put in place any measures to protect and support the student on campus, or to manage any contact between the student and the supervisor, during the investigation, and it failed to offer any remedy for the impact of the incident on the student's studies.
The case study has been released after nearly 100 British universities were named on a website where students have been anonymously sharing experiences of sexual harassment, abuse and assault.
A number of the UK's top institutions were mentioned more than 50 times on the Everyone's Invited website which has highlighted allegations of a "rape culture" in education settings.
The watchdog's annual report says: "There has been some good work in the sector to support reporting of unwanted behaviour (of various kinds), but it can still be very difficult for students to raise concerns about sensitive issues and it is important that providers do all they can to make it as easy as possible for students to do this and to support them effectively when they do."
During 2020, the regulator also held a number of discussion groups with black, Asian and minority ethnic students who said that micro-aggressions "were a commonplace experience".
Some students said it was difficult to know when something was "worth" reporting and they felt that their concerns might not be taken as seriously by their provider as those of white students.
The report concludes: "These are significant considerations both for providers, in terms of students from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds having confidence in and feeling empowered to use internal complaints processes, and in turn for us."
