Rebekah Vardy denies 'nasty b***h' message was about Coleen Rooney, court hears

9 February 2022, 20:23 | Updated: 9 February 2022, 20:27

Rebekah Vardy was not referring to Coleen Rooney in a message reading "nasty b***h", a court has been told.

It comes amid an ongoing feud between the pair after Ms Rooney - dubbed "Wagatha Christie" - accused Ms Vardy in a Twitter post in 2019 of leaking stories about her private life after a months-long "sting operation".

She claimed Ms Vardy had shared fake stories she posted on her personal Instagram account with The Sun newspaper.

However, Ms Vardy denies the accusations and is suing Ms Rooney for libel.

The popular wags are married to former England star Wayne Rooney and Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy respectively.

At the start of a preliminary hearing on Tuesday, the High Court heard that WhatsApp messages between Ms Vardy and her agent and friend Caroline Watt had been disclosed to Ms Rooney's legal team.

Her barrister, David Sherborne, claimed that "abusive" messages were sent about Ms Rooney.

However, on Wednesday, Ms Vardy's barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC said a text in which she referred to someone as a "nasty b***h" was not about Ms Rooney.

"This is not a passage about Ms Rooney, it is a passage about someone else," he said.

Mr Tomlinson previously told the court that the messages referred to by Mr Sherborne, which were said to "reveal that Ms Vardy and Ms Watt are responsible for the leaking", were "selective", and said parts of the exchanges which were left out had "precisely the opposite effect".

Read more: Met to contact over 50 'party attendees' as pic shows PM near alcohol at No10 quiz

Read more: Kurt Zouma’s cats rescued by RSPCA and he’s fined ‘£250,000’ as police probe kicking video

During Tuesday's hearing, the barrister quoted messages from Ms Vardy to Ms Watt in which she said she was "offended" that Ms Rooney thought she was the person who had leaked the information.

He added: "If one reads these messages in full, what one sees is that Ms Vardy expresses shock at being accused and she is here communicating with the person that Mr Sherborne says is her co-conspirator.

"These are obviously candid personal messages, and if she was really concerned - 'Oh, this is terrible, we have been found out' - then it would have been completely different."

Ms Rooney is bringing a claim against Ms Watt for misuse of private information and is asking for it to be joined to the libel case.

However, Ms Vardy's lawyers have opposed the application to add the claim against Ms Watt to the case.

"If the defendant had genuinely wished to bring a misuse of private information claim against Ms Watt in order to vindicate her rights this claim could have been brought 15 months ago," Mr Tomlinson said in written arguments.

Ian Helme, for Ms Watt, also opposed the application and previously said she has given "clear and consistent" denials against the claim for misuse of private information.

Mr Sherborne told the court that if Ms Vardy wins her claim on the basis that she was not the person who leaked the information, then Ms Rooney will be left without "vindication" unless she is able to bring the claim against Ms Watt as part of the same case.

He added that while Ms Rooney's lawyers wanted further information from the WhatsApp messages between Ms Vardy and Ms Watt, Ms Watt's phone had fallen into the sea after a boat she was on hit a wave, shortly after the last hearing.

"(It was) most unfortunate, because it was only a short time after the court ordered that the phone should be specifically searched," he said.

Discussing the lost phone on Wednesday, Mr Tomlinson said: "That is what happened. Ms Vardy was not present when that happened. She (Ms Watt) was on holiday, she lost her phone."

The trial is due to begin in early May but is likely to be delayed.

The hearing before Ms Justice Steyn concluded on Wednesday, with judgment expected on Monday morning.