Meghan Markle letter to dad published by Mail is 'serious invasion of privacy', court hears

19 January 2021, 12:01 | Updated: 19 January 2021, 15:07

Meghan is suing the publisher of The Mail On Sunday and MailOnline over a series of articles which reproduced parts of a handwritten letter
Meghan is suing the publisher of The Mail On Sunday and MailOnline over a series of articles which reproduced parts of a handwritten letter. Picture: PA

By Matt Drake

An "intrinsically private, personal and sensitive letter" written by Meghan Markle to her estranged father Thomas Markle was a "plain and serious invasion" of privacy, her lawyers have told the High Court.

The Duchess of Sussex, 39, is suing the publisher of The Mail On Sunday and MailOnline over a series of articles which reproduced parts of the handwritten letter sent to 76-year-old Thomas Markle in August 2018.

She is seeking damages for alleged misuse of private information, copyright infringement and breach of the Data Protection Act over five articles, published in February 2019, which included extracts from the "private and confidential" letter to her father.

Her lawyers argue Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) has "no prospect" of defending against her claim of misuse of private information and alleged breach of copyright over the publication of the letter.

At the start of a two-day remote High Court hearing on Tuesday, Meghan's lawyers asked Mr Justice Warby to grant "summary judgment" in relation to her privacy and copyright claims, a legal step which would see those parts of the case resolved without a trial.

Read more: 24/7 Covid vaccine clinics to be piloted within weeks, minister tells LBC

Meghan Markle opens up about the struggles of being in the public eye

Justin Rushbrooke QC, representing the duchess, described the hand-written letter as "a heartfelt plea from an anguished daughter to her father", which Meghan sent to Mr Markle "at his home in Mexico via a trusted contact ... to reduce the risk of interception".

He said the "contents and character of the letter were intrinsically private, personal and sensitive in nature" and that Meghan therefore "had a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of the contents of the letter".

Mr Rushbrooke added in written submissions: "It is as good an example as one could find of a letter that any person of ordinary sensibilities would not want to be disclosed to third parties, let alone in a mass media publication, in a sensational context and to serve the commercial purposes of the newspaper."

The barrister argued that "there is no real prospect of the defendant establishing that the claimant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to the contents of the letter and the defendant's contentions to the contrary are utterly fanciful".

Mr Rushbrooke continued that, even if ANL was justified in publishing parts of the letter to Mr Markle, "on any view the defendant published far more by way of extracts from the letter than could have been justified in the public interest", saying the Mail's "use of the letter was and is manifestly disproportionate".

Read more: Rapid vaccine rollout could see lockdown start to be lifted in March, minister says

Meghan Markle's father Thomas speaks out in new documentary

In relation to Meghan's copyright claim, Ian Mill QC, also representing the duchess, argued that "she and she alone" created a draft of the letter to her father "which she then transcribed by hand".

He argued the letter to Mr Markle was "an original literary work in which copyright subsists and is owned by the claimant" and asked the court to "grasp the nettle and decide the issue at this hearing".

Antony White QC, representing ANL, said in written submissions that the case was "wholly unsuitable for summary judgment".

Mr White said there was "uncertainty as to a number of significant factual matters which can, and should, be investigated at trial when the court will have the full picture in terms of disclosure and evidence".

He added: "This is particularly so when the claimant's case in respect of certain important factual issues has shifted, (including) in relation to the circumstances in which the letter was written and the extent to which she had disclosed information about the letter with a view to publication.

"There are now on the record a number of inconsistent statements made by her that she will need to explain."

Mr White argued that, if the court assessed whether Meghan had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to the letter, "it would be likely to come to the conclusion that the claimant has not shown a reasonable expectation of privacy" and that "on the contrary, she expected or intended its contents to enter the public domain".

The full trial of the duchess's claim was due to be heard at the High Court this month, but last year the case was adjourned until autumn 2021 for a "confidential" reason.

The remote hearing before Mr Justice Warby is due to last two days and it is expected he will reserve his judgment to a later date.

More Latest News

See more More Latest News

King Charles performs a Hongi, a traditional Maori greeting, with Mere Takoko

King Charles shares traditional Maori nose rub greeting with activist as he launches environmental charity

Putin issued a chilling threat to the West as he confirmed Russia launched a ballistic missile against Ukraine

Putin issues chilling warning to UK and US as he confirms Russia hit Ukraine with new 'experimental' ballistic missile

Telegraph writer Allison Pearson.

Police drop investigation into journalist Allison Pearson over tweet - as review to be launched over handling of case

Exclusive
Angela Rayner has paid tribute to John Prescott

Angela Rayner says John Prescott 'used to call her after PMQs to remind her to stay true to who she is'

Four men have been arrested accused of attempting to rob a mobile phone store

Undercover police arrest four men after EE shop raided by masked gang

Matt Gaetz withdraws as Donald Trump's nominee for attorney general amid sexual misconduct allegations

Matt Gaetz withdraws as Donald Trump's nominee for attorney general amid sexual misconduct allegations

Donald Trump Watches SpaceX Launch Its Sixth Test Flight Of Starship Spacecraft

Elon Musk pledges to fire civil servants who work from home

Seven-month-old baby mauled to death by family dog after leaning on animal while crawling, inquest hears

Seven-month-old baby mauled to death by family dog sustained 'catastrophic' injuries after leaning on pet, inquest hears

Starmer has backed the International Criminal Court over its arrest warrant for Netanyahu

Starmer backs International Criminal Court after it issues arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu

Five men charged over smuggling of migrants from UK to France in lorries

Five men charged over smuggling of migrants from UK to France in lorries following dawn raids

Rhiannon Skye Whyte was stabbed to death in Walsall

South Sudanese teen accused of murdering asylum seeker hotel worker with screwdriver 'refuses to appear in court'

Will Guyatt questions who is responsible for the safety of children online

Are Zuckerberg and Musk responsible for looking after my kids online?

Simone White has died following a poisoning with alcoholic drinks at a bar in Loas

British lawyer, 28, dies following suspected mass methanol poisoning at bar in Laos

Russia has claimed that Britain is directly involved in the war in Ukraine

Britain now 'directly involved in war in Ukraine', Russian ambassador to UK says

Finlay MacDonald is accused of trying to murder his wife Rowena

Jealous husband 'murdered brother-in-law and tried to kill wife' after finding text saying she planned to leave him

Teenager jailed for least 22 years after fatally stabbing motorbike enthusiast who named attacker in dying breath

Teenager jailed for at least 22 years after fatally stabbing motorbike enthusiast who named attacker in dying breath