
Clive Bull 2am - 4am
26 March 2025, 13:35 | Updated: 26 March 2025, 17:02
In her Spring Statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has admitted the 2025 growth estimate for the UK has been halved.
It has been slashed from 1% from 2% by the government's official forecaster, the Office for Budget Responsibility.
Despite this, she claimed the OBR has upgraded its longer term growth estimates from 2026.
She sought to blame much of these economic woes on "increased global uncertainty".
Her warnings about a world "that is changing before our eyes" was largely directed at the economic impact of war in Ukraine, and the West's ongoing clash with Russia.
However, this warning could also be interpreted as a signal that Donald Trump's tariffs on all imports to America will hit the British economy.
'I feel gaslit': Natasha Clark analyses the Chancellor's Spring Statement
Reeves also claimed households will £500 better off under this government.
"That will mean more money in the pockets of working people," she added.
She also said she plans to get more people into jobs and that inflation is expected to gradually fall.
"Having peaked at 11% under the previous government, the OBR forecast that CPI inflation will average 3.2% this year before falling rapidly to 2.1% in 2026 and meeting the 2% target from 2027 onwards,".
Reeves added the OBR has upgraded their growth forecast "next year and every single year thereafter", saying: "With GDP growth of 1.9% in 2026, 1.8% in 2027, 1.7% in 2028, and 1.8% in 2029.
"By the end of the forecast our economy is larger compared to the OBR's forecast at the time of the budget."
Ms Reeves added: "Compared to the forecast in the final budget delivered by the party opposite, and after taking account of inflation, the OBR say today that people will be on average over £500 a year better off under this Labour Government."
Read more: Judge blocked paedophile’s deportation to Pakistan because he 'could be persecuted as an alcoholic'
Read more: E-bikes to be banned from Tube, Elizabeth line and London Overground due to fire risk
Reeves said her statement "does not contain any further tax increases" before she highlighted a crackdown on tax evasion.
She told the Commons: "Today, I go further continuing our investment in cutting-edge technology, investing in HMRC's capacity to crack down on tax avoidance and setting out plans to increase the number of tax fraudsters charged each year by 20%.
"These changes raise a further £1 billion taking total revenue raised from reducing tax evasion under this Government to £7.5 billion."
Fiscal rules set out last year are non-negotiable - Rachel Reeves
'Disappointment'
Labour MP for Norwich South, Clive Lewis told LBC Reeves was "balancing the books" on disabled people.
"We as MPs and many of my constituents watched as for 14 years, George Osborne and successive Tory chancellors pillaged, burned, dismantled public services, destroyed our communities, undermined our infrastructure.
"And we thought we'd learnt the lesson that you can't balance the books on broken backs, that you can't cut your way to growth.
"I thought we'd learned that lesson, but it doesn't feel we have.
"And I think that's part of the disappointment."
A coalition of more than 100 disability organisations has said further cuts to welfare will "heighten alarm" among claimants.
Charles Gillies, co-chair at the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: "The Chancellor has chosen to double down on harmful benefits cuts, despite warnings this approach will push more disabled people into poverty and worsen people's health.
"Since the cuts were announced last week, we've seen an outpouring of fear and dread from disabled people, including many with MS.
"The extra cuts announced today will heighten alarm even further, largely hitting those who are unable to work and rely on these benefits to survive.
"People are wondering how they'll continue to cover their basic living expenses and the extra costs of their disability - like visits from carers to help with things like washing, cooking and going to the toilet. The Government has a moral obligation to scrap these cuts before the real damage is done."
Oxfam said the spring statement marked " a new low in the fight against poverty and inequality".
The charity's senior policy adviser Anna Marriott said: "Today marks a new low in the fight against poverty and inequality as the Government chooses to cut vital international aid and social security support for millions of people struggling at home and around the world while protecting the soaring wealth of millionaires and billionaires.
"Three-quarters of the British public back Government tax increases on the very richest instead of these cruel and unnecessary cuts, but the Chancellor has decided to turn her back on fairness.
"These cuts are not just numbers on a balance sheet but will cost lives and have a devastating impact on people facing conflict, poverty and climate disasters around the world.
"It's not about tough decisions; it's about political choices. The Government must stop protecting extreme wealth and start protecting people."
Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride has accused Labour leaders of having "reneged on their promises to the British people" during last year's general election.
Mr Stride told the Commons: "Given her track record, given the fact that she has failed to control spending and borrowing to date, what does she think the markets are going to make of her latest promises? "But (Chancellor Rachel Reeves) says of course that none of this - none of this - is her fault, that it's the war in Ukraine, it is (US) president (Donald) Trump, it is tariffs, it is (Russian) president (Vladimir) Putin, it is the Conservatives, it is (the) legacy, it is anybody but her.
"But what the British people know is that this is a consequence of her choices. She is the architect of her own misfortune: it was (Ms Reeves) who talked down the economy, who talked down the economy so that business surveys and confidence crashed through the floor. "It was (Ms Reeves) who confected the £22 billion black hole, a smokescreen that was only ever there in order to cover up for the fact that she and the Prime Minister (Sir Keir Starmer) reneged on their promises to the British people during the last general election."