Sex addict anti-terror cop jailed after hiding spy cameras to film women naked in hotels

21 January 2022, 15:56 | Updated: 21 January 2022, 16:58

A counter terrorism officer has been jailed after he was found using high-tech spyware to secretly record naked women.

Detective Inspector Neil Corbel, 40, was jailed for three years after he was caught using hidden cameras, stashed in every day items, to video his unsuspecting victims for up to four hours.

The sex addict committed his crimes in hotel rooms and Airbnbs in London, Brighton and Manchester hiding, sometimes as many as nine spy cameras in tissue boxes, phone chargers, air fresheners, glasses, keys and headphones.

The senior Metropolitan police officer purchased the high-end spyware online and posed as an airline pilot to book models for photoshoots before planting the gadgets.

Married father-of-two Corbel was caught after a model, who had agreed to pose naked for a photo shoot, became suspicious of a digital clock.

When he was arrested, Corbel told police he was addicted to pornography and officers found images of 51 women on his hard drive, with 19 victims, including 16 models and three escorts, agreeing to make statements against him.

Read more: Babes in the Wood child killer Russell Bishop dies from cancer aged 55

Read more: 'Think about your kids': Brother's desperate phone call with Texas synagogue attacker

Three of Corbel's victims watched on as he was jailed, having faced him in court to read their victim impact statements.

One model, who agreed to pose for a "fashion and artistic nude shoot", was visibly angry as she told Corbel in court his crimes had "affected every aspect of my life".

"I have pulled so much of my hair out with stress I have bald spots and have had to turn down work," she said, showing her scalp to the court.

Other victims, who were not in court, mentioned the case of 33-year-old marketing executive Sarah Everard, who was snatched off the street before being raped and murdered by Met Pc Wayne Couzens, 48.

"The fact that he is policeman is a huge deal," said one. "These people are meant to protect us. Following the murder of Sarah Everard this feels like a very frightening time to be a woman."

Corbel, who resigned after being suspended by the Met, where he was attached to the Continuous Policing Improvement Command, pleaded guilty to 19 voyeurism offences at Westminster Magistrates' Court in September.

Read more: British doctor killed after gun fired 'recklessly' by neighbour as he lay in bed in US

Read more: Poorest people 'made to balance the books': Food campaigner explains cost of living crisis

Edward Henry QC, defending, told the court Corbel felt "genuine remorse" for the "deplorable activity" but is voluntarily seeking to "combat" his sex addiction.

He said Corbel, who had "put people away who would have done terrible harm and caused much bloodshed" during his 13-year career, did not spend police money or commit the offences on police time.

"He crossed the line from addiction that may harm himself to an addiction that caused these criminal offences at a time when he was under acute stress at work," said Mr Henry.

Judge Martin Edmunds QC jailed Corbel for a total of three years at Isleworth Crown Court on Friday for the offences across the London, Manchester and Brighton areas between January 2017 and February 2020.

He said: "You used a range of deceptions to induce women to take off their clothes in your presence so you could record videos for your sexual gratification," he told Corbel.

"You did so using multiple strategically placed covert cameras, sometimes as many as nine."

Read more: Desperate LBC callers share cost-of-living impact on their families

Read more: Europe must 'provide weapons to Ukraine' for defence against Russia, Rory Stewart warns

The judge said the victims "were entitled to have the personal autonomy" and each had set "clear boundaries".

"It is clear that you derived satisfaction from breaching those boundaries by committing these offences rather than seeking out persons who might have offered the opportunity to video them without deception," he continued.

"You did not exploit your police role either to locate or intimidate your victims - rather it was something concealed from them.

"Further, the covert recording devices you used appear to have been readily available to purchase on the internet.

"There is no evidence you used police equipment or specialist police knowledge.

"However, it is clear that the revelation to your victims that you were a serving police officer has for many of them seriously undermined their trust in the police, something for those individuals, given their various lines of work, is a particularly serious matter, just as the revelation of your offending must impact on public trust."